In a hypothetical example of empire A beginning a liberation war (ideology casus belli) against empire B, and empire B picks a conquest war goal, then a status quo resolution means: empire A keeps nothing. Any time a ship is lost. I've noticed something in the game I'm in. in any case i definitely need to learn how to play the war exhaustion gameThe most important lesson is that war exhaustion isn't as important as it may seem. CryptoIf you slap penalties on 100% war exhaustion, the smaller, losing side will accrue those penalties for the majority of the war's duration since they normally reach 100% WE very quickly due to, well, losing the war. I have two planets that are under occupation and I pushed them out of territory I owned and they have taken significant. They always have my war exhaustion up by 5-7% more than their own. After 2 battles with the enemy. ago. Enforce a status quo. Why is my war exhaustion going up despite buffs, traditions, and not getting even close to losing. That would get rid of the problem of. I win every space battle. Also, they are machine intelligence, which lowers their war exhaustion I think. A Status Quo Peace is you get to keep whatever claimed systems. You can win a fight but gain more exhaustion because you lost a higher proportion of your ships, same with invasions. It's nice that the game doesn't force you to surrender when you hit 100% WE, but rather it pressures you to surrender to avoid the malus. The situation was almost the same in 1. With no ability to force Status Quo, the war will continue until one side achieves their War Goals, or is entirely eradicated. Your perfect start is ruined, you got the Irassians yet again. Before they forced a white peace, they were sending ME surrender requests where I would cede them their claimed systems, despite them having nothing left and being at 100% war exhaustion. Slower war exhaustion is part of gestalt consciousness. Destroying the enemy's entire fleet only gets you +50 points and getting them to 100% war exhaustion only gets you +100. We're making changes to the War Exhaustion following your feedback. You can consider warscore as the new "acceptance", they can have 100% war exhaustion and you can be no where closer to "winning" the war than when you started. Fast forward a few more years and we took every system they had under control, and another empire declared war on them, yet they still didn't surrender. no, there is no forced surrender. War Exhaustion trigger percent: 40%. . They don't have ships or fleets anymore. Makes. Yes, they have enough fleets somewhere. The problem is that you usually do not. Business, Economics, and Finance. I'm just here to put my chips in the "war exhaustion is broken" stack. IN theory with a player or AI, but the AI usually asks for your surrender as soon as you hit that point. . I set it to fastest and am just waiting for them it to tick to 100% but GOD it's ticking slow. You just need enough to enforce the demand on the war screen that you need to check. You can go to the war screen and demand some/all of your objectives at any time during the war. In my game, a revolutionary exclave just "won" its indepndence war after 56 years. Just like the player can at most be forced to a status quo after 2 years at 100%. Do note, if you have claims against them, when they surrender, they won't be subjugated. Check the beta, there was a patch notes and dev diary listing the change: "100 war exhaustion no longer forces you to surrender. War exhaustion is constantly added, just the amount can be changed. The war exhaustion information is always accurate, but working out where the war exhaustion comes from can be essentially impossible in all but the most straight forward engagements. War exhaustion represents your population’s willingness to continue fighting. You understood wrong. 100% war exhaustion doesn't make you surrender, it just forces status quo. Or, at least, this has been my experience. 113. In Stellaris it has no penalties at all. Apparently my nation is 78% towards accepting a forced status quo, while the enemy only 56%. Before year 2394 (earliest save I can load back), we reached 74% / 100% in War Exhaustion, and I thought I had just to wait for a couple of years before status quo would be chosen by my war leader. My war exhaustion is at like 13% for both sides. I've noticed something in the game I'm in. The enemy was virtually forced to inaction: in my war, 65% of their WE came from occupation (49 systems, 12 colonies). -----3) Disengage and Emergency Retreat While these are technically combat mechanics, they certainly play a role considering how crucial 1) is. irritatedBowel. And war. If war ends with you having 100% war exhaustion and enemy 50% it means your enemy used half the. 3+ fleets. But thats a better place to be than where stellaris is. war exhaustion will give a modifier towards accepting peace offers but you cannot be forced to surrender Then how do you lose, for example, a humiliation war where there is no goal of claiming territory? I have lost wars of that type before so i know for a fact forced surrender is a thing. At this point I have taken roughly little over half their systems, including having landed troops and occupying the planets I control. Disclaimer: I don't have Nemesis and Overlord + no mods installed. The higher their war exhaustion, the more likely they'll accept a status quo, and the more likely. Business, Economics, and Finance. One I was the aggressor and the current one the PC is the aggressor. GameStop Moderna Pfizer Johnson & Johnson AstraZeneca Walgreens Best Buy Novavax SpaceX Tesla. You have the perfect start. The war exhaustion system in stellaris is quite different. Excess armies are initially placed in a reserve area behind the frontline and replace any. l_x_fx. 1% reduction. 100% war exhaustion means you used up what your country considers to be an okay amount of resources for war. Same thing can happen with 2 players. Tributary war goal. Ships 'destroyed' this way cause 5x war exhaustion. The reason you need to occupy all the planets in systems you claimed to Enforce War Goals is that the game enforces a penalty for unoccupied systems and planets, which looks something like: planet (-10), system (-100). Instead, your unity gain is reduced by 90% and your influence gain is set to 0. However -4 is not a lot and they do not have full exhaustion yet. I find. That is not a Status Quo Peace. 631. Are the AI empires not forced into surrendering after 2 years at 100% War Exhaustion? No. Wasn't a total war, just subjugate. Can someone please explain me the war exhaustion? I already played 2 games and in both, an empire declares war on me with at least 6 claims (+/-). I've also occupied around 6 planets as part of my goals, Killing 86 of their armies without. Its supposed to help force an end to the war at some point, so you don't spend 40 years fighting over essentially 2 systems, but the forced surrender doesn't seem to effect the AI like it does you. This of course assuming my humans…For most wargoals war exhaustion isn't enough to get the AI to surrender, it's more useful for getting status quo with them. I let the war go on for a while longer but it still won't let me end this war. My gripes with the combat system: Even when extremely outnumbered, disengage can yield 0 losses (aka 0. The exhaustion in Stellaris, as mention above, is absolutely not tied to the necessary war. There is no Human cost to warfare in Stellaris, it requires 0 pops engaged in the military to have a strong. edit: Actually, missphrased that: To ENFORCE a surrender, you need to have 100% occupation. Stellaris peace system is about the most unfun peace system of all the paradox strategy games. pops feel drained by the mental strain of their telepathic cry for help (flavor text) Possible negative effects after war along with % chance of happening: 20% decreased biological pop resource output-- 30% chance. War exhaustion . The "war exhaustion timer" is for status quo, not for complete victory. Impose Ideology is -100; Humiliate is -50; Conquer scales with the amounts of claims you have. #2. Not really. The war exhaustion information is always accurate, but working out where the war exhaustion comes from can be essentially impossible in all but the most straight forward engagements. Eventually its +100 from exhaustion so still -50. Soviets declare war on Romania for 2 pretty crappy states and the Romanians have to march past the Urals and to Vladivostok, and then annex the entirety of Russia to end it. war exhaustion will give a modifier towards accepting peace offers but you cannot be forced to surrender Then how do. I can sympathize with many of the complaints but like the suggested solutions even less. AI will never surrender to a total war war goal even if. or status quo 2 years after the opponent reached 100% war exhaustion. " They will be forced to auto-accept. Pro tip: never, ever expect a surrender, never assume the other side will surrender and never surrender yourself if it loses planets. My first legit playthrough is going very well except for one thing: war exhaustion during wars. Why am I not. But then you see the dreaded pop up. You get a -100 warscore penalty for demanding a surrender and a -100 penalty for demanding vassalization. I have two planets that are under occupation and I pushed them out of territory I owned and they have taken significant. Can't invade the ally to try and force a surrender either since there's a 4th nation blocking you. The problem is that the gains are too high from certain things and it doesn't really care. They always have my war exhaustion up by 5-7% more than their own. You could have won years ago (100% war exhaustion starts a countdown, the enemy can’t force leave immediately) but you didn’t and this mechanic represents your citizenry becoming sick of it. Instead, your unity gain is reduced by 90% and your influence gain is set to 0. But this didn't work because "my war goal does not allow surrender. I've been in two wars with the same enemy empire. That should be factored into your war planning. They have very little chance of recouping from this as they have no fleets, no. The reason you need to occupy all the planets in systems you claimed to Enforce War Goals is that the game enforces a penalty for unoccupied systems and planets, which looks something like: planet (-10), system (-100). He attacks me twice, I lose some ships but win the battles. One thing Stellaris really needs to do is give you a way to get a list of unoccupied claims (especially if you have. It will make them accept any status quo peace you offer (in wich you would get the terriotries you have claims on AND occupy militarily, so often a white peace is a way better option to end a war then going. You need to deal with the other empire now. The two are rarely entirely connected. GameStop Moderna Pfizer Johnson & Johnson AstraZeneca Walgreens Best Buy Novavax SpaceX Tesla. that's also true in stellaris. 24 months after you hit 100% exhaustion, you can be forced into Status Quo. Also, there's a timer, not immediately after reaching 100%. Imagine declaring a war, taking all the territory you can. Join. GameStop Moderna Pfizer Johnson & Johnson AstraZeneca Walgreens Best Buy Novavax SpaceX Tesla. 100% war exhaustion alone isn't enough to get the enemy to capitulate, but it does give a +100 modifier to the calculations used by the AI to decide when to surrender. War exhaustion represents your population’s willingness to continue fighting. Of course the slowdown of the game and nerf to the ability to build big fleets over the iterations means that its. However even several years after reaching 100% exhaustion they will stagnate at -39 Acceptance to surrender. The war exhaustion in this. Because right now - according to the Devs no less - forcing surrender requires 100% war exhaustion AND 100% occupation. You can reduce the build up of war exhaustion, but you can't reduce existing exhaustion. If you go in with enough armies and fleets you'll get them to surrender before you hit 100% war exhaustion. It made absolutely no sense. Adds [deposit id] resource deposit or planetary feature to the selected celestial body. g. When you get involved in a catastrophic war in stellaris, your planets and people never go up in arms or on strike. War exhaustion is just a bad status quo mechanic. A war of aggression was declared against me by an empire south of me (Nharr Empire). But in theory if not one of the empires sue for peace it could go on. If you are at a 100% warscore, AI will always accept all your demands. step 5 : repeate step 3 to 4 untill you win the war. You could have the losing side at 100% war exhaustion, then the winning side refuses peace, resulting in numerous revolts for the losing side. the other attacking enemy was on like 100% war exhaustion. War Exhaustion is terrible. I cannot win even if I do occupy all their space and planets. * This mod has been developed to decrease the overall excess war exhaustion the empires experience from combat unit loss. Status quo peace means both sides keep any systems they have both occupied and claimed. the AI is, and because war exhaustion isn't at 100% they will never status quo even though we have nothing to gain and everything to lose from continuing the wars. Usually I find they won't accept due to demanding unoccupied systems/planets. Originally posted by FIBBIDEH: After you reach 100% war exhaustion, after 2 years a status quo can be forced on you. I lost zero soldiers on the attack, because it was a test game and I had way over-tiered soldiers they had no hope of resisting. As for you vs them there are 3 main factors. Base War exhaustion is 3x faster. A big contributor is loss of ships. The only way to force surrender is to do what you have claimed to have done: Occupy everything the opposing side owns (including allies if they have any). A place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the 4X grand strategy…Just because. And the AI only ends a war when both hit 100 %. But if you're fully occupying some of their systems that you claimed, you're still going to "win" the war - you'll get a bunch of. You can go to the war screen and demand some/all of your objectives at any time during the war. Meanwhile, the winner will usually get to 100% war exhaustion more slowly so he gets the ability to force peace at an opportunate moment first. I am using the base game. There are no other mechanisms tied to it. ) It counts as points towards the enemy's willingness to surrender or accept a status quo. You'd peace out *before* you hit 100% war exhaustion in this case. The. Hopefully having 2x or 3x the required warscore for 100% will allow me to conclude these wars the way I'd expect. vassailize war goal -100 War exhaustion +97. 380K subscribers in the Stellaris community. . It even had revanchism when you lost territory. Yes, but only for the final stage, or if the Galactic Community declares a preemptive crisis war. Business, Economics, and Finance. With this, the I would gain 100% exhaustion first and the AI, after 2 years will be able to enforce demands without making any progress. I've won every space battle (apart from the small handful of time in which they attacked a weak outpost). so. It has no bearing on actual victory, other than providing an 'out' so that the. But no, they just give 0. • 1 yr. But then you see the dreaded pop up. The only way they’d get systems/planets from that is if they were occupying claimed systems. I won every single battle (land or space). Being at 100% war exhaustion isn't a surrender, it means you have to accept a. g. You can never 'force' a surrender. "Furthermore, I think Carthage should be destroyed. 3 is based off the fleet value of the ship and your ship capacity. If you have ten corvettes each ship lost is 10% exhaustion added for each lost, if you have 100 each corvette lost is only 1% war exhaustion. . #3. #1. He will still win at 100 tho since surrender is -25 and there's 70 to go. Feb 10, 2020. ago. Nothing much happened, and I took a nearby undefended system…If you slap penalties on 100% war exhaustion, the smaller, losing side will accrue those penalties for the majority of the war's duration since they normally reach 100% WE very quickly due to, well, losing the war. That's the war exhaustion system working correctly. because when you reach 100% war exhaustion its not automatic surrender, its forced status quo, as such since your ally didn't demand a status quo they did not end the conflict but regardless a surrender outcome only occurs if you conquer entirely, you can see this from trying to complete war goals when at war, a conquer casus belli is only possi. Sure it won't change that issue but it's not really an issue, if an empire is doing so poorly their war exhaustion is at 100% then clearly they're massively losing war so they should be crumbling in short order. WTF. There is literally no way for it to fail at that point, until the player grinds through all of the planetary invasions needed to get Occupation up to 51%. Sure, an unconquered planet can also mean, that another Empire is also waging war on your target and is holding some planets, thus they do not count towards their war. The Negotiate UI is. No one can be forced to surrender without opposing war goals being occupied. Especially now that somehow AI seems to rampantly Vassalize to a degree that I cannot comprehend how they make such agreements, it's very hard to be in a war with only 1 or 2 enemies. You can only be forced to accept a white peace, which would have resulted in gains for you. War Exhaustion isn't a measure of who is winning. The enemy's war weariness reaches 100%, but the war still goes on for 20 years. No ships for me to destroy, can't take his 1 planet so we sit there. It seems you've only occupied 16% of their territory. Originally posted by Agent Orange: When an empire or alliance in a war reaches 100% war exhaustion, it can be forced into a status quo peace if you want to. 3. That means every system and planet of ALL opponents, including allies, not just the main target. 4100 war exhaustion means that they can request a Status Quo - not that you have to surrender. WAR_EXHAUSTION_SHIP_KILLED_MULT = 0. once they hit 100% war exhaustion they should get another +100 on top of the war exhaustion for high war exhaustion which would easily push it over to vassalization. GameStop Moderna Pfizer Johnson & Johnson AstraZeneca Walgreens Best Buy Novavax SpaceX Tesla. Groud Battles: 0% (killing defensive armies doesn't matter I guess) Occupation: 24%. War exhaustion is not a measure of success or 'winning'. - Never surrender (-25%) Also the first tech is just a tier 2, you can get it very early:. Kempeorlaxan May 3, 2020 @ 1:26am War Exhaustion 100% Surrender Question I played as Terravore on higher difficulties - one of the advanced AI expanded very fast and. #7. Declare War, invade system. War exhaustion isn’t the same as war score in other pdx games. . 11. A party can only force a status quo peace 720 days after the OTHER party reached 100% war exhaustion. So I have a war going on against a faction and their ally. Almost all our war weariness came from just normal accumulation, while that had about 20% from space battles (they got massacred) and only like 8% from almost their entire federation being conquered. Guaranteed Independence leads to Neverending War!! I have a rival empire just below me that's been a pain in my ass since the beginning. And the fact war exhaustion ticks up means that it's actually possible to put enough armies on a planet to make a literally unconquerable planet. To actually force surrender, you would have to occupy literally their entire empire, plus all of their allies in the war. The arbitrary 2 year limit can also render allies useless, as a war can hit 100 war exhaustion and then 2 years pass before the allies can even GET to the warzone. I've been in two wars with the same enemy empire. However, I am the on gaining more war exhaustion despite not engaging at all. You have to open the war view and choose "status quo. not my favorite thing in Stellaris. A party can only force a status quo peace 720 days after the OTHER party reached 100% war exhaustion. so now even thought own all planets they will not give up. 392K subscribers in the Stellaris community. I've been in two wars with the same enemy empire. Even in victory casualties, resource drain, and general stress accumulate into exhaustion. 631. Every other paradox game has War Score which is basically a track of who is winning and by how much. Like here. . 11. War exhaustion is only how close your nation is close to calling it quits. . Buster_cherryUA. #2. The number of armies that can be engaged in combat on either side is five plus one-fifth of the planet size. This is then used to determine when one side will surrender and how much the winner can demand of them. I have only 5 systems and they didn't touch it for entire war. One I was the aggressor and the current one the PC is the aggressor. Everstill Colonel. The increases for 1 and 2 are a static amount. This is then used to determine when one side will surrender and how much the winner can demand of them. Militarists have no effect on war exhaustion. Since AI won't surrender to a Total War, they can end only in Status Quo or the destruction of one empire. 2. War exhaustion, or a populaces dissatisfaction with war will increase with any losses even if a Battle is won. However I saw no way to change my war goals. That's how we lost the Vietnam war, too. Story/rant time: I declare war on an awakened empire and absolutely stomp their entire fleet, their war exhaustion shoots up to 70 while mine is only at 20. I'm on good terms with them and they're huge. All wars except those of independence have a negative surrender acceptance, which are countered by factors such as relative navy strength (up to +50),. Ship and army loses, occupation and technology. . If one side has 100%, a countdown starts and at the end of it the other side can force peace. 3. Stellaris AAR: No Love, No Comfort. The last one technology is a technology that reduces your fatigue by 10% and is extremely useful. we got tired of his shit and decided to go to war and split him up and lock his empire into a single system. If I was to surrender I would be totally integrated beacuse of their ideology. About the first three years, the enemy's war weariness has reached 100%, and I think he will surrender automatically after two or three years, as written in the wiki. PlutonArioch Dec 10, 2022 @ 11:29pm. On the topic of War Score and War Exhaustion. Your ally, not you, was the war leader and he forced. WTF War Exhaustion. CryptoWar exhaustion basically vanishes the moment the war is over and starts over at zero if you go right into the next war. You get bonus influence from them surrendering if you choose the humiliate war goal. The current system, of a 2 year timer after 100% war exhaustion, could be implemented, where your stability multiplier is the average of your last 2 years war exhaustion values. No-one else is at war with any of the federation members including the Ovarians. War exhaustion in Stellaris is just a mechanic to prevent foreverwars between the AI and the player exploiting the AI through war too. As I am in a federation, I was eventually asked to vote for or against a war with a neighboor we had previously fought with. But ok fine. Surrender would only make the one who press it actually surrender. Remember to fully occupy every claimed system and planet before you do so. I'm pretty sure thats a bug and not intended. No you don't understand I think- the war doesn't have to end in a surrender. If you're "reking" your opponent to 100 exhaustion but he still doesn't want a full surrender you still have as long as it takes for you to reach 100 as well before the automatic status quo enforces to get as many more claims as you can. They won't accept defeat when I offer them the achieve war goals option, because I've claimed every system in their empire and it reduces their. It usually says why they won't capitulate. 100% war exhaustion alone isn't enough to get the enemy to capitulate, but it does give a +100 modifier to the calculations used by the AI to decide when to surrender. I'm really enjoying the experience so far, although I did have to relearn a lot. This is due to war exhaustion in Stellaris being hard capped at 100. ok, so I will admit, i am a noob to this game, got it only 2 days ago, but ive lerned the basics and have been winning wars. g. because when you reach 100% war exhaustion its not automatic surrender, its forced status quo, as such since your ally didn't demand a status quo they did not end the. War Exhaustion is just a clock. Elitewrecker PT Sep 17, 2021 @ 7:04am. I've been in two wars with the same enemy empire. Which I found strange that they didn't do the same thing for Stellaris because it only makes sense. Though the fact the Overlord hasn't demanded surrender yet probably is a bug since the AI should be coded to demand surrender once the other side will accept it. So you can see how you get situations like the OP where the AI fights this massive, decimating battle and seems to get no war exhaustion from it. Judging by the numbers, it looks like they're at -200 from surrender and a vassalization wargoal and +196 from factors including 100 war exhaustion and 46 occupation. Militarists just shoot more. With automatic Status Quo. Everything is glorious. I don't want to go to war with the AI Federation. That’s what happens in stellaris. Feb 24, 2018. Business, Economics, and Finance. Once their war exhaustion reaches 100%, you can force a status quo peace. 1. That is not the same thing as a surrender! All occupied claims are turned over to the occupier, and that's it. ago. Is anyone else finding it difficult to raise the war exhaustion of the enemy? I went to war with an empire that had less ships and far less tech. Just set reasonable war goals and go for those. An amazing starting area with great habitable planets, a perfect choke point, no nearby powerhouses to threaten you. Even worse, I occupy many of his planets,. If you are at a 100% warscore, AI will always accept all your demands. I creamed them in every fight barely losing any ships but they still only have 4% higher "Space Battle" Exhaustion than me. GameStop Moderna Pfizer Johnson & Johnson AstraZeneca Walgreens Best Buy Novavax SpaceX Tesla. Since AI won't surrender to a Total War, they can end only in Status Quo or the destruction of one empire. The exhaustion percentage is creeping up so slowly that it will probably be a hundred years before it gets to 100 percent and hopefully the Caloctora will surrender even though the Fallen Empire hasn't done a thing to them. War exhaustion for the small empire vs the AI Federation is at 89%. Always occupy then status quo by driving enemy war exhaustion to 100. To get them to surrender is much more difficult, and in vassalization, it's when you control every planet/habitat by invading them. No Please explain your issue is in as much detail as possible. Over the decades, I've managed to beat them into "Inferior/Pathetic" fleet status, and claim a third of their empire. Also, any fix to alliance War Exhaustion has to ensure that the 1v1 wars are not affected. The reason you need to occupy all the planets in systems you claimed to Enforce War Goals is that the game enforces a penalty for unoccupied systems and planets, which looks something like: planet (-10), system (-100). If you load the attached save game, you'll see the Adeex State (rebels) have been on 100% WE for years now, but won't surrender and oddly, hasn't been defeated. Crisis empires get the -75% war exhaustion bonus at stage two, when they can still wage normal wars and well before triggering the galaxy-wide total war. Personally I'd also like the entire war system to be overhauled, AI forcing you into white peace when you hit 100% war exhaustion is kinda really lame, if I had a choice, I'd rather take happiness/Deviancy debuffsempire-wide for each additional month spent in a war at 100% exhaustion. If the other side surrenders, all of their systems will be ceded. ) If it reaches 100%, then after 2 years you can FORCE them to accept a status quo end to the war [and the same applies from them to you]. In RL war exhaustion forced a surrender and an economic depression which lasted until nazi Germany. In the case of a subjugation war, if you get a status quo then all the systems you fully occupy (meaning own the star base AND have successfully invaded with armies if there's a planet) wil splinter off into another new empire as your vassal. 113.